Neowhat?

May 10, 2006

An internal clamour

So I'm in Tokyo for a conference for work. I had no Internet connection for over a day while I travelled; in fact I don't have one right now, as I type this -- I plan to post it later, once I get to the conference center, where there's a wireless connection.
[update: I posted it]

I'm sure that many people have written about this before. Having no Internet connection made me feel like a lost cyborg, I have to admit—I'm so used to looking things up, surfing when I get bored, catching my daily news and comics—It was like the rushing and murmur of humanity that surrounds me had gone silent, and my eyes and ears had been cut off from the larger world. My horizon shrank down to what I could physically see and hear, which for most of that time was either an airport terminal or a small section of an airplane cabin that faded out beyond the British engineer on my left and the sleeping Japanese guy on my right. Plus in-flight entertainment.

It was meditative.

I was forced to deal with the noise and chaos in my mind myself, rather than being able to look outward for stimulation and a sense of order. At the time, it was unpleasant. Claustrophobic, itchy, boring. When a clamor arose inside me, instead of turning to a louder clamor from outside to drown it out, I had to listen. Now I'm glad that I did it. I didn't take a book, I didn't read the in-flight magazine. I did watch a movie, The New World, an intense, scenic piece about Jamestown and Capt. Smith and the Indian Princess whose name I can't remember, because I don't have the Internet as I write this. It was actually contemplative as well. And I peeked at the cartoons (The Family Guy, for example) silently playing on DVD on the British Engineer's laptop to my left. I was grateful to not hear the soundtrack—he had on headphones—it looked even noisier than I was interested in hearing.

And I had a Japanese phrase book. While useful and interesting, it didn't hold my attention (sleepy and jet laggy) for more than a few minutes at a time.

So I got to really think. It was good. We're supposed to meditate, after all. Regularly. Which I suppose means more than once every few months, in an ideal world.

Bring thyself to account each day, ere thou art summoned to a reckoning. For death, unheralded, shall come upon thee, and thou shalt be called to give account for thy deeds.
—Bahá'u'lláh

Memorization: for when you don't have the Internet.

I thought about my family, my children, my relationship with Bahiyyih, my service to the Bahá'í community and to humanity (or the lack of it), my daily habits and patterns. Basic stuff.

I'll have to remember to do it again.


Posted by Billy at May 10, 2006 07:23 PM
Comments
You are a really funny guy. Go meditation go! Love love to you.
Posted by: Bahiyyih at May 11, 2006 11:12 PM
Thank you, sweetie! Actually, that's a variant of my Most Successful Joke Ever -- I ad libbed in a skit on "India Night" at the Baha'i World Centre, playing a skate boarder visiting the Lotus Temple. The guide (a real-life granddaughter of Collis Featherstone, I think, who had actually guided at the Indian Temple as well), who was trying to explain reverence to me, asked, "Have you prayed before?" to which I answered "Yeah, once" or something like that. Anyway, it must have been in the timing or presentation, but the audience, including Ruhiyyih Khanum, in the front row, laughed out loud at it. My moment of shininess. The next night we did the same skit again, but I couldn't bring myself to give the same line again, despite being set up for it, because I thought it was a one-time thing, not to be captured.
Posted by: Billy at May 12, 2006 01:02 AM
One, very pedantic, comment about The New World: the woman's name is never given in the film, I understand. But it is Pocahontas. In addition, Native Americans never had princesses, nor any heriditary position of honor analagous to royalty. This is a complete misnomer started by the Europeans when they arrived. I know that no slur was intended, but this kind of thing bugs me. Like I said, pedantic. Love~ Amy
Posted by: Amy Eades at May 13, 2006 12:34 AM

That's a good point, Amy, and it's supported by the film -- "princess" was clearly a title given to her by the Europeans, because she was a chief's daughter. No matter that she had been disowned (in the movie, anyway) by the time she was welcomed by the Europeans.

It was a beautiful movie, more "observational" than narrative, choosing simply to show the events, with as much beauty as possible, rather than explain them. It would be nice to see it on a better quality screen some time -- an airplane seat-back LCD is not exactly cinematic :)

Here's Roger Ebert's review of it. An excerpt:

Terrence Malick's "The New World" strips away all the fancy and lore from the story of Pocahontas and her tribe and the English settlers at Jamestown, and imagines how new and strange these people must have seemed to one another. If the Indians stared in disbelief at the English ships, the English were no less awed by the somber beauty of the new land and its people. They called the Indians "the naturals," little understanding how well the term applied.

And then later in the review:

The are two new worlds in this film, the one the English discover, and the one Pocahontas discovers. Both discoveries center on the word "new," and what distinguishes Malick's film is how firmly he refuses to know more than he should in Virginia in 1607 or London a few years later. The events in his film, including the tragic battles between the Indians and the settlers, seem to be happening for the first time. No one here has read a history book from the future.

A couple more recent films that also show more than they explain (I'm sure it's a common approach, but I think it's interesting), also as reviewed by Mr. Ebert: The Death of Mr. Lazarescu and Flight 93.


Posted by: Billy at May 15, 2006 02:11 PM
Post a comment











(Spam prevention)

Remember personal info?